Would you save 1 or 5 people?

The trolley problem has been the subject of many surveys in which about 90% of respondents have chosen to kill the one and save the five. If the situation is modified where the one sacrificed for the five was a relative or romantic partner, respondents are much less likely to be willing to sacrifice the one life.

Is it right to kill one person to save many?

Meanwhile, the deontological perspective asserts that certain actions – like killing an innocent person – are just wrong, even if they have good consequences. In both versions of the trolley problem above, utilitarians say you should sacrifice one to save five, while deontologists say you should not.

Is it ethical to sacrifice one person or a few people for the greater good of many others?

Hence, killing an innocent individual for the “greater good” can be morally acceptable as the “greater good” implies a net positive utility for society at large. Sacrifice as it means to kill someone can be perfectly illustrated for the scope of this paper with the example of ancient human sacrifice for the gods.

Why did research participants state that they would kill one person to save five?

Why did research participants state that they would kill one person to save five when it involved flipping a trolley switch but then refuse to apply the same "kill one to save five" when it involved pushing a person? They used the emotional part of the brain to refuse to push.

Would you kill 5 people or 1 person?

The trolley problem has been the subject of many surveys in which about 90% of respondents have chosen to kill the one and save the five. If the situation is modified where the one sacrificed for the five was a relative or romantic partner, respondents are much less likely to be willing to sacrifice the one life.

Would you sacrifice one person to save five? - Eleanor Nelsen

Why do you think that so many people want to attend the trial to kill a mocking bird?

This reminds Mr. Cunningham that he is a father like Atticus and that he is behaving shamefully. Why do you think that so many people wanted to attend the trial? So many people want to attend the trial because this trial might change the cycle that the black defendant would always lose because of racial prejudice.

Is killing someone for the greater good ethical?

Utilitarianism expresses that a moral action is good or right if it maximises happiness and minimises pain for the greatest number (Hayward, 2017). Therefore, a utilitarian would claim that it is acceptable to sacrifice an innocent person if as a direct result happiness would be maximized for the greatest number.

Is favoritism an ethical dilemma?

One of the most basic themes in ethics is fairness, stated this way by Artistotle: "Equals should be treated equally and unequals unequally." Favoritism, cronyism, and nepotism all interfere with fairness because they give undue advantage to someone who does not necessarily merit this treatment.

Is human sacrifice ethical?

Despite its historical prevalence, human sacrifice is now largely rejected in contemporary societies, often viewed through a critical lens that reflects on the ethical implications and cultural contexts that shaped these practices.

Is it okay to sacrifice the few for the many?

Utilitarianism supports sacrificing the few for the many by prioritizing actions that maximize overall happiness or welfare. However, it can also critique this idea by recognizing potential abuses when minority groups are unjustly harmed under the guise of promoting greater good.

Is the killing of 3 or more people at one time?

A mass murder typically occurs in a single location where one or more persons kill several others. In the United States, Congress defined mass murders as the killing of three or more persons during an event with no "cooling-off period" between the homicides.

What is the punishment for killing one person?

The minimum sentence for murder in the first degree is life in prison with the possibility of parole after 30 years; if the defendant was a minor who was at least 15 years old at the time of the murder the minimum sentence is life in prison with the possibility of parole after 15 years.

Has the trolley problem happened in real life?

And interestingly, when analyzing real-world accident data, automotive researchers failed to find an actual instance of a trolley-type problem with humans. So this hypothetical situation is unrealistic – even with human drivers.

What is the fat man problem?

The trolley is about to go underneath a bridge; on that bridge, there is a fat man. If that fat man is pushed over the bridge, his weight will stop the oncoming trolley, he will die, but the five tied to the track will be saved.

What is trolley theory?

Trolley problem, in moral philosophy, a question first posed by the contemporary British philosopher Philippa Foot as a qualified defense of the doctrine of double effect and as an argument for her thesis that negative duties carry significantly more weight in moral decision making than positive duties.

Is To Kill a Mockingbird racist?

Careful reading reveals Atticus to be racist, and racism, segregation, and a caste system are displayed throughout the story. “The Mockingbird” is written from a white privileged perspective.

Why should we put people on trial when we know they are guilty?

The defendant cannot plead guilty because they would be over-punished for what they really did. A trial may be necessary to fight some of the more serious charges. If not, the defendant might be facing a much longer jail sentence than necessary.

Is To Kill a Mockingbird a true story?

1. It's based on a true story. The tale of To Kill A Mockingbird is based on Harper Lee's memories of her family, her neighbours and an event that occurred near her hometown of Monroeville, Alabama when she was just 10. Atticus and Jem are both inspired by her father and older brother.

What is the most kills you can get in absurd trolley problems?

What's the answer to the trolley problem?

In response to the Problem, philosophers influenced by Kant have argued that one ought not to use human beings as a means to save others, so it would be morally right to steer the trolley away from the five, but morally wrong to push the fat man.

Is the trolley problem an ethical dilemma?

The trolley problem, also called the trolley dilemma, is an ethical thought experiment.

Do any religions still do human sacrifice?

Today, human sacrifice has become extremely rare. Modern secular laws treat human sacrifices as murder. Most major religions in the modern day condemn the practice.

Is sacrifice considered dying?

In general, yes. A creature being sacrificed counts as it dying. Yes. As long as there is no replacement effect such as Rest In Peace.

Are humans naturally ethical?

Scientists often affirm that morality is a human biological attribute because they are thinking of the predisposition to make moral judgments, that is, to judge some actions as good and others as evil.